Allied Health NDIS Audit Checklist
Practice StandardsNDIS Practice Standards and Quality Indicatorsndis-practice-standards--core-service-agreements
Requirement

Core module: Service agreements

The Core module outcome service agreements: every quality indicator the NDIS Practice Standards set for it (Core 20.1 to Core 20.5), what an auditor asks to see under each, the common gaps, and a free worksheet to fill in.

Clause

NDIS Practice Standards Core 20.1 to Core 20.5

Regulator

NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission

Edition held

Rules Schedules 1 to 8, Compilation No. 6 (F2026C00527) and Quality Indicators Guidelines Compilation No. 3 (F2026C00528), in force 1 July 2026

Checked current

6 October 2026, Federal Register: both compilations are the latest version on 6 October 2026

Who it applies to

Registered NDIS providers audited by certification: registered for early childhood supports, specialist behaviour support, implementing behaviour support plans or regulated restrictive practices, or specialised support coordination. An individual or partnership whose only certification requirement is early childhood supports meets only Core clause 7 (freedom from abuse) and Module 3 (Rules s 20(4) and (5)).

Under review, not in force

The NDIS Commission's review of the Practice Standards (a proposed quality framework and changes to the standards and how they are assessed) is still being considered; nothing from it is in force.

Core 20.1Service agreements: developed with the participant, with conditions explainedsource
Requirement, our statement of the clause

The provider develops a service agreement together with each participant that sets expectations, explains the supports to be delivered and states any conditions attached to delivery, including the reasons for those conditions.

Evidence that typically shows this
  • Signed service agreements in a sample of participant files
  • Service agreement template showing supports, conditions and reasons
  • Meeting notes from the agreement discussion
Common gap to check
  • Conditions such as cancellation rules imposed without explanation
  • Agreement lists supports not matching those actually delivered
Core 20.2Service agreements: helping the participant understand the agreementsource
Requirement, our statement of the clause

The provider supports each participant to understand their service agreement and its conditions, using the language, mode of communication and terms the participant is most likely to understand.

Evidence that typically shows this
  • Easy Read or translated service agreement versions
  • Records of interpreter or advocate use during agreement discussions
  • Participant feedback or interview notes confirming understanding
Common gap to check
  • Complex legal wording with no accessible summary
  • No support offered to participants with cognitive disability
Core 20.3Service agreements: signed copies or a record of why none was givensource
Requirement, our statement of the clause

Where a service agreement is in writing, each participant receives a copy signed by both the participant and the provider; where that is not practicable or the participant chooses not to have an agreement, the provider records the circumstances.

Evidence that typically shows this
  • Agreements signed by both parties with the participant's copy noted as given
  • File notes recording why an agreement was not signed or not wanted
  • Agreement register tracking status for each participant
Common gap to check
  • Unsigned agreements with no explanation on file
  • Only the provider's signature present
Core 20.4Service agreements: SIL in SDA dwellings, documented arrangementssource

Supported independent living in specialist disability accommodation is not an allied health support; left out of a therapy practice's register and counts.

Requirement, our statement of the clause

Where the provider delivers supported independent living in specialist disability accommodation, documented arrangements with each participant and each SDA provider set out who is responsible for: raising and addressing dwelling concerns; managing conflicts between participants; agreeing and communicating changes in circumstances or support needs; filling shared living vacancies with regard to each participant's needs, preferences and situation; and managing behaviours of concern that may put tenancies at risk.

Evidence that typically shows this
  • Tripartite or interface agreements between participant, SIL provider and SDA provider
  • Documented vacancy management process that includes current residents' views
  • Conflict management procedure for shared homes
  • Records of dwelling concerns passed to the SDA provider and their resolution
Common gap to check
  • No written arrangement with the SDA provider on maintenance or vacancies
  • Residents not consulted when a vacancy is filled
Core 20.5Service agreements: supports to be provided in an emergency or disastersource
Requirement, our statement of the clause

Service agreements set out how supports will be provided if an emergency or disaster occurs. SDA providers should also meet the Part 8 SDA outcomes.

Evidence that typically shows this
  • Service agreement clause on supports during emergencies and disasters
  • Cross-reference from the agreement to the participant's emergency plan
  • Communication sent to participants on changes to supports during a past emergency
Common gap to check
  • Agreements silent on what happens to supports in an outbreak or natural disaster
  • Emergency arrangements in the agreement inconsistent with the organisation's plan
Worksheet: what your practice holds, and where
RefHeld (yes, partly, no, not applicable)Where it is keptOwnerLast reviewedNext review
Core 20.1
Core 20.2
Core 20.3
Core 20.4
Core 20.5

Completing this worksheet records what your practice holds and where. It does not make a practice compliant or ready for audit, and it is not legal advice.

Related requirements

NDIS Practice Standards and Quality Indicators

See every requirement for your practiceSee the specimen practice