Core module: Service agreements
The Core module outcome service agreements: every quality indicator the NDIS Practice Standards set for it (Core 20.1 to Core 20.5), what an auditor asks to see under each, the common gaps, and a free worksheet to fill in.
NDIS Practice Standards Core 20.1 to Core 20.5
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission
Rules Schedules 1 to 8, Compilation No. 6 (F2026C00527) and Quality Indicators Guidelines Compilation No. 3 (F2026C00528), in force 1 July 2026
6 October 2026, Federal Register: both compilations are the latest version on 6 October 2026
Registered NDIS providers audited by certification: registered for early childhood supports, specialist behaviour support, implementing behaviour support plans or regulated restrictive practices, or specialised support coordination. An individual or partnership whose only certification requirement is early childhood supports meets only Core clause 7 (freedom from abuse) and Module 3 (Rules s 20(4) and (5)).
NDIS Practice Standards and Quality Indicators on the standards library
The NDIS Commission's review of the Practice Standards (a proposed quality framework and changes to the standards and how they are assessed) is still being considered; nothing from it is in force.
The provider develops a service agreement together with each participant that sets expectations, explains the supports to be delivered and states any conditions attached to delivery, including the reasons for those conditions.
- Signed service agreements in a sample of participant files
- Service agreement template showing supports, conditions and reasons
- Meeting notes from the agreement discussion
- Conditions such as cancellation rules imposed without explanation
- Agreement lists supports not matching those actually delivered
The provider supports each participant to understand their service agreement and its conditions, using the language, mode of communication and terms the participant is most likely to understand.
- Easy Read or translated service agreement versions
- Records of interpreter or advocate use during agreement discussions
- Participant feedback or interview notes confirming understanding
- Complex legal wording with no accessible summary
- No support offered to participants with cognitive disability
Where a service agreement is in writing, each participant receives a copy signed by both the participant and the provider; where that is not practicable or the participant chooses not to have an agreement, the provider records the circumstances.
- Agreements signed by both parties with the participant's copy noted as given
- File notes recording why an agreement was not signed or not wanted
- Agreement register tracking status for each participant
- Unsigned agreements with no explanation on file
- Only the provider's signature present
Supported independent living in specialist disability accommodation is not an allied health support; left out of a therapy practice's register and counts.
Where the provider delivers supported independent living in specialist disability accommodation, documented arrangements with each participant and each SDA provider set out who is responsible for: raising and addressing dwelling concerns; managing conflicts between participants; agreeing and communicating changes in circumstances or support needs; filling shared living vacancies with regard to each participant's needs, preferences and situation; and managing behaviours of concern that may put tenancies at risk.
- Tripartite or interface agreements between participant, SIL provider and SDA provider
- Documented vacancy management process that includes current residents' views
- Conflict management procedure for shared homes
- Records of dwelling concerns passed to the SDA provider and their resolution
- No written arrangement with the SDA provider on maintenance or vacancies
- Residents not consulted when a vacancy is filled
Service agreements set out how supports will be provided if an emergency or disaster occurs. SDA providers should also meet the Part 8 SDA outcomes.
- Service agreement clause on supports during emergencies and disasters
- Cross-reference from the agreement to the participant's emergency plan
- Communication sent to participants on changes to supports during a past emergency
- Agreements silent on what happens to supports in an outbreak or natural disaster
- Emergency arrangements in the agreement inconsistent with the organisation's plan
| Ref | Held (yes, partly, no, not applicable) | Where it is kept | Owner | Last reviewed | Next review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core 20.1 | |||||
| Core 20.2 | |||||
| Core 20.3 | |||||
| Core 20.4 | |||||
| Core 20.5 |
Completing this worksheet records what your practice holds and where. It does not make a practice compliant or ready for audit, and it is not legal advice.
Related requirements
NDIS Practice Standards and Quality Indicators
- Core 19.1 to Core 19.9Core module: Support planning
- Core 21.1 to Core 21.4Core module: Responsive supports
- Core 18.1, Core 18.2, Core 18.3Core module: Access to supports
- Core 22.1, Core 22.2, Core 22.3Core module: Transitions
- Core 16A.1 to Core 16A.9Core module: Emergency and disaster
- Core 24.1 to Core 24.11Core module: Safe environment
- Core 16.1 to Core 16.5Core module: Continuity of supports
- Core 25.1, Core 25.2, Core 25.3Core module: Money and property
- Every page of this instrument
See every requirement for your practiceSee the specimen practice